D. Andrews and L. Goodson, A comparative analysis of models of instructional design, Journal of Instructional Development, vol.17, issue.232, pp.2-16, 1980.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02904348

S. A. Barab, M. A. Evans, and E. Baek, Activity theory as a lens for characterizing the participatory unit, Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, pp.199-213, 2004.

A. Barrère, Pourquoi les enseignants ne travaillent-ils pas en ??quipe???, Sociologie du Travail, vol.44, issue.4, pp.481-497, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0038-0296(02)01278-5

A. K. Bednar, D. Cunningham, T. M. Duffy, and J. D. Perry, Theory into practice: How do we link, Instructional technology: Past, present, and future, pp.100-112, 1995.

J. F. Bobbitt, The curriculum, 1918.

J. Bonner, Implications of cognitive theory for instructional design: revisited, Educational Communication and Technology Journal, vol.36, issue.1, pp.3-14, 1988.

R. A. Braden, The case for linear instructional design and development : a commentary on models, challenges, and myths, Educational Technology, vol.36, issue.2, pp.5-23, 1996.

R. Brien, Science cognitive et formation, 1994.

C. M. Clark and R. J. Yinger, Teacher planning, Exploring teachers' thinking, pp.84-103, 1987.

V. De-landsheere and G. De-landsheere, Définir les objectifs de l'éducation (5 e éd, 1984.

M. R. De-villiers, The Dynamics of theory and practice, Thèse de sciences de l'éducation non publiée, 2002.

P. Dessus, Effets de l???exp??rience et de la mati??re dans l???utilisation de routines pour la planification de s??quences d???enseignement, Cahiers de la Recherche en Éducation, pp.1-28, 1995.
DOI : 10.7202/1018201ar

P. Dessus, La planification de séquences d'enseignement, objet de description ou de prescription ? Revue Française de Pédagogie, pp.101-116, 2000.
DOI : 10.3406/rfp.2000.1024
URL : http://hal.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/hal-01233418/document

P. Dessus and E. De-vries, Do students apply constructivist principles in designing Computer-Supported Learning Environments ?, 2004.

. Joiner, Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer-supported learning, Proceedings of the first joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with Computers Tübingen: Knowledge Media Research Center, pp.73-84

G. S. Edmonds, R. C. Branch, and P. Mukherjee, A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.41, issue.3, pp.55-72, 1994.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02298055

Y. Engeström, Activity theory and individual and social transformation, Perspectives on activity theory, pp.19-38, 1999.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003

D. C. Fields, The impact of R. M. Gagné's theories on practice, The legacy of Robert Gagné Syracuse: ERIC Clearinghouse on Instructional Technology, pp.183-209, 2000.

R. M. Gagné, The Conditions of learning (2 e éd.), 1970.

R. M. Gagné, Learning and Instructional Sequence, Review of Research in Education, vol.1, pp.3-33, 1973.
DOI : 10.2307/1167193

R. M. Gagné, Les principes fondamentaux de l'apprentissage, 1976.

R. M. Gagné, The Conditions of learning (4 e éd.), 1985.

R. M. Gagné, Learning hierarchies, The legacy of Robert Gagné Syracuse: ERIC Clearinghouse on Instructional Technology, pp.63-84, 2000.

R. M. Gagné and L. J. Briggs, Principles of instructional design, 1974.

R. M. Gagné and W. Dick, Instructional Psychology, Annual Review of Psychology, vol.34, issue.1, pp.261-295, 1983.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.ps.34.020183.001401

L. W. Gregg, Methods and models for task analysis in instructional design Hillsdale, Cognition and instruction, pp.109-115, 1976.

J. R. Hayes and J. G. Nash, On the nature of planning in writing The Science of writing, pp.29-55, 1996.

P. W. Jackson, Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialists, Handbook of research on curriculum, pp.3-40, 1996.

D. H. Jonassen, Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.26, issue.1, pp.65-94, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02299613

D. H. Jonassen and L. Rohrer-murphy, Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.34, issue.2, pp.61-79, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02299477

D. H. Jonassen, M. Tessmer, and W. Hannum, Task analysis methods for instructional design, 1999.

J. A. Kirby, C. M. Hoadley, and A. A. Carr-chellman, Instructional systems design and the learning sciences: A citation analysis, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.2, issue.4, pp.37-48, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02504856

H. M. Kliebard, revisited, Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol.55, issue.1, pp.81-88, 1995.
DOI : 10.2307/1179647

N. Lebrun and S. Berthelot, Design de systèmes d'enseignement. Ottawa: Éditions ARC (rééd. 1994 sous le titre Plan pédagogique, 1991.

J. Lee and C. M. Reigeluth, Formative research on the Heuristic Task Analysis process, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.8, issue.1, pp.5-24, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02504541

R. Lewis, An Activity Theory framework to explore distributed communities, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol.13, issue.4, pp.210-218, 1997.
DOI : 10.1046/j.1365-2729.1997.00023.x

M. Linard, Concevoir des environnements pour apprendre : l'activité humaine, cadre organisateur de l'interactivité technique, Sciences et Techniques Éducatives, vol.8, pp.3-4, 2001.

D. Merrill, Instructional transaction theory: instructional design based on knowledge objects, Educational Technology, vol.36, issue.3, pp.30-37, 1996.

T. Murray, Authoring Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An analysis of the state of the art, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol.10, pp.98-129, 1999.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197339

J. Petraglia, The real world on a short leash: The (mis) application of constructivism to the design of educational technology, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.4, issue.1, pp.53-65, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02299761

G. J. Posner, Models of curriculum planning The curriculum, problems, politics, and possibilities, pp.77-97, 1988.

P. Rabardel, Les hommes et les technologies, 1995.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01017462

T. J. Ragan and M. L. Smith, Conditions-based models for designing instruction, Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, pp.541-569, 1996.

F. Raynal and A. Rieunier, Petit vocabulaire de pédagogie à l'intention des enseignants, 1991.

C. M. Reigeluth and C. A. Rogers, The elaboration theory of instruction: Prescriptions for task analysis and design, NSPI Journal, vol.7, issue.1, pp.16-26, 1980.
DOI : 10.1002/pfi.4180190109

R. A. Reiser, A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.51, issue.2, pp.53-64, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02504506

R. A. Reiser, A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.51, issue.2, pp.57-67, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02504928

R. Richey, The legacy of Robert Gagné, 2000.

A. J. Romiszowski, Developing auto-instructional materials, 1986.

I. F. Sari and C. M. Reigeluth, Writing and evaluating textbooks: Contributions from instructional theory The technology of text, pp.53-90, 1982.

D. A. Schön, Le praticien réflexif (Trad, Montréal : Logiques, 1994.

F. Schott, Instructional design, International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, pp.7566-7569, 2001.

N. M. Seel, Models of instructional design: Introduction and overview, Instructional Design, International perspectives, pp.355-359, 1997.

H. A. Simon, Les sciences de l'artificiel (Trad, 2004.

S. Singh, How a big idea is born, New Scientist, pp.2476-2499, 2004.

B. F. Skinner, Teaching Machines: From the experimental study of learning come devices which arrange optimal conditions for self-instruction., Science, vol.128, issue.3330, pp.969-977, 1958.
DOI : 10.1126/science.128.3330.969

P. L. Smith and T. J. Ragan, The impact of R. M. Gagné's work on instructional theory, The legacy of Robert Gagné Syracuse: ERIC Clearinghouse on Instructional Technology, pp.147-181, 2000.

J. M. Spector, Gagné's influence on military training research and development, The legacy of Robert Gagné Syracuse: ERIC Clearinghouse on Instructional Technology, pp.211-227, 2000.

J. Sweller and P. Chandler, Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn, Cognition and Instruction, vol.8, issue.3, pp.85-233, 1994.
DOI : 10.1207/s1532690xci0701_1
URL : http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07370008.2017.1262105

R. D. Tennyson, Instructional System Development: The Fourth Generation, Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, vol.14, issue.3, pp.229-252, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-57821-2_3

R. W. Tyler, Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, 1950.

J. J. Van-merriënboer and P. A. Kirschner, Three worlds of instructional design: State of the art and future directions, Instructional Science, vol.29, issue.4/5, pp.429-441, 2001.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1011904127543

K. M. Wiburg, An historical perspective on instructional design, The first international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning, CSCL '95, 1995.
DOI : 10.3115/222020.222836

J. Willis, A recursive, reflective instructional design model based on constructivistinterpretivist theory, Educational Technology, vol.35, issue.6, pp.5-23, 1995.