A. Alesina, P. Giuliano, and N. Nunn, Fertility and the Plough, American Economic Review, vol.101, issue.3, pp.499-503, 2011.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.101.3.499

J. Andreoni and C. Sprenger, Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences, American Economic Review, vol.102, issue.7, pp.3357-76, 2012.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.102.7.3357

N. Bardsley, Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact?, Experimental Economics, vol.12, issue.2, pp.122-133, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10683-007-9172-2

H. P. Binswanger, Attitudes Toward Risk: Theoretical Implications of an Experiment in Rural India, The Economic Journal, vol.91, issue.364, pp.867-890, 1981.
DOI : 10.2307/2232497

A. Booij and G. V. De-kuilen, A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory, Journal of Economic Psychology, vol.30, issue.4, pp.651-666, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.004

A. Booth, L. Cardona-sosa, and P. Nolen, Gender differences in risk aversion: Do single-sex environments affect their development?, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.99, issue.0, pp.126-154, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.12.017
URL : http://repository.essex.ac.uk/12291/1/SSRN-id1965150.pdf

A. L. Booth and P. Nolen, Gender differences in risk behaviour: does nurture matter?*, The Economic Journal, vol.34, issue.558, pp.56-78, 2012.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02480.x
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.388.57

P. Bordalo, N. Gennaioli, and A. Shleifer, Salience Theory of Choice Under Risk, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.127, issue.3, pp.1243-1285, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/qje/qjs018
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.186.5598

P. Brooks and H. Zank, Loss Averse Behavior, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.16, issue.3, pp.301-325, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s11166-005-5105-7

J. P. Byrnes, D. C. Miller, and W. D. Schafer, Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis., Psychological Bulletin, vol.125, issue.3, p.367, 1999.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367

J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 1988.

P. Crosetto and A. Filippin, The ???bomb??? risk elicitation task, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.42, issue.8, pp.31-65, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s11166-013-9170-z
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01123020

P. Crosetto and A. Filippin, A theoretical and experimental appraisal of four risk elicitation methods, Experimental Economics, vol.42, issue.8, pp.613-641, 2016.
DOI : 10.1007/s10683-006-7055-6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01356900

R. Croson and U. Gneezy, Gender Differences in Preferences, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.47, issue.2, pp.448-74, 2009.
DOI : 10.1257/jel.47.2.448

D. Silva, S. Baldo, D. Matsushita, and R. , Biological correlates of the Allais paradox, Applied Economics, vol.30, issue.5, pp.555-568, 2013.
DOI : DOI:10.1057/9780230226203.0032

C. Dave, C. Eckel, C. Johnson, and C. Rojas, Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better?, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.38, issue.1, pp.219-243, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s11166-010-9103-z
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.322.6166

C. Deck, J. Lee, J. A. Reyes, and C. C. Rosen, A failed attempt to explain within subject variation in risk taking behavior using domain specific risk attitudes, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.87, pp.1-24, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.11.010

E. Dekel and S. Scotchmer, On the Evolution of Attitudes towards Risk in Winner-Take-All Games, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.87, issue.1, pp.125-143, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/jeth.1999.2537

T. Dohmen, A. Falk, D. Huffman, U. Sunde, J. Schupp et al., INDIVIDUAL RISK ATTITUDES: MEASUREMENT, DETERMINANTS, AND BEHAVIORAL CONSEQUENCES, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol.9, issue.3, pp.522-550, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x
URL : http://digitalarchive.maastrichtuniversity.nl/fedora/get/guid:3bd722e3-ab03-4159-a20b-f2913bea9070/ASSET1

A. Dreber and M. Hoffman, Biological basis of sex differences in risk aversion and competitiveness, 2010.

C. C. Eckel and P. J. Grossman, Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk, Evolution and Human Behavior, vol.23, issue.4, pp.281-295, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00097-1

C. C. Eckel and P. J. Grossman, Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.68, issue.1, pp.1-17, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2008.04.006

C. C. Eckel and P. J. Grossman, Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence of Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, pp.1061-1073, 2008.

H. Fehr-duda, M. D. Gennaro, and R. Schubert, Gender, Financial Risk, and Probability Weights, Theory and Decision, vol.52, issue.2-3, pp.283-313, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11238-005-4590-0
URL : http://e-collection.library.ethz.ch/eserv/eth:27357/eth-27357-01.pdf

A. Filippin and P. Crosetto, A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes, Management Science, vol.62, issue.11, pp.3138-3160, 2016.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2294
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01356905

S. Gaechter, E. J. Johnson, and A. Herrmann, Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. Discussion Papers 2010-20, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, 2010.

U. Gneezy and J. Potters, An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.112, issue.2, pp.631-676, 1997.
DOI : 10.1162/003355397555217
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.192.5183

G. W. Harrison and E. E. Rutströmrutstr¨rutström, Risk Aversion in the Laboratory, Risk Aversion in Experiments, vol.95, pp.41-196, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/S0193-2306(08)00003-3

S. R. Heilbronner, A. G. Rosati, J. R. Stevens, B. Hare, and M. D. Hauser, A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos, Biology Letters, vol.22, issue.2, pp.246-249, 2008.
DOI : 10.1126/science.7455683

J. D. Hey and C. Orme, Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data, Econometrica, vol.62, issue.6, pp.1291-1326, 1994.
DOI : 10.2307/2951750

J. D. Hey and N. Pace, The explanatory and predictive power of non two-stage-probability theories of decision making under ambiguity, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.162, issue.3, pp.1-29, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s11166-014-9198-8

C. Holt and S. Laury, Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects, American Economic Review, vol.92, issue.5, pp.1644-1655, 2002.
DOI : 10.1257/000282802762024700
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.374.1104

R. Isaac and D. James, Just who are you calling risk averse, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.20, issue.2, pp.177-187, 2000.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1007881008177

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica, vol.47, issue.2, pp.263-91, 1979.
DOI : 10.2307/1914185
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.294.6361

O. Haridon and F. Vieider, All Over the Map: Heterogeneity of Risk Preferences across Individuals , Prospects, and Countries. Economics & Management Discussion Papers em, pp.2016-2020, 2016.

J. A. List, On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games, Journal of Political Economy, vol.115, issue.3, pp.482-493, 2007.
DOI : 10.1086/519249

G. Loomes and R. Sugden, Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty, The Economic Journal, vol.92, issue.368, pp.805-829, 1982.
DOI : 10.2307/2232669

L. Menkhoff and S. Sakha, Estimating risky behavior with multiple-item risk measures, Journal of Economic Psychology, vol.59, pp.59-86, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.joep.2017.02.005

J. A. Nelson, Not-So-Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking, Feminist Economics, vol.22, issue.2, pp.114-142, 2016.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594

T. Nielsen, A. Keil, and M. Zeller, Assessing farmers??? risk preferences and their determinants in a marginal upland area of Vietnam: a comparison of multiple elicitation techniques, Agricultural Economics, vol.27, issue.30, pp.255-273, 2013.
DOI : 10.1111/agec.12009

E. Petit, A. Tcherkassof, and X. Gassmann, Anticipated regret and self-esteem in the Allais paradox. Cahiers, 2011.

A. Reynaud and S. Couture, Stability of risk preference measures: results from a field experiment on French farmers, Theory and Decision, vol.36, issue.21, pp.203-221, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s11238-012-9296-5

A. G. Rosati and B. Hare, Chimpanzees and Bonobos Exhibit Emotional Responses to Decision Outcomes, PLoS ONE, vol.405, issue.5, pp.1-14, 2013.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0063058.s009
URL : http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063058

U. Schmidt and S. Traub, An Experimental Test of Loss Aversion, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.25, issue.3, pp.233-282, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1020923921649

R. Trivers, Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection & the Descent of Man, pp.136-179, 1972.