Safe options induce gender differences in risk attitudes

Abstract : Gender differences in risk attitudes are frequently observed, although recent literature has shown that they are context dependent rather than ubiquitous. In this paper we try to rationalize the heterogeneity of results investigating experimentally whether the presence of a safe option among the set of alternatives explains why females are more risk averse than males. We manipulate three widely used risk elicitation methods finding that the availability of a safe option causally affects risk attitudes. The presence of a riskless alternative does not entirely explain the gender gap but it has a significant effect in triggering or magnifying (when already present) such differences. Despite the pronounced instability that usually characterizes the measurement of risk preferences, we show, estimating a structural model, that the effect of a safe option is remarkably stable accross tasks. This paper constitutes the first successful attempt to shed light on the determinants of gender differences in risk attitudes.
Type de document :
Pré-publication, Document de travail
Working paper GAEL n° 05/2017. 2017
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [45 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger
Contributeur : Agnès Vertier <>
Soumis le : mercredi 31 mai 2017 - 11:01:04
Dernière modification le : lundi 30 avril 2018 - 11:30:03
Document(s) archivé(s) le : mercredi 6 septembre 2017 - 14:52:39


GAEL-WP-2017-05 Crosetto-Filip...
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)


  • HAL Id : halshs-01529643, version 1




Paolo Crosetto, Antonio Filippin. Safe options induce gender differences in risk attitudes. Working paper GAEL n° 05/2017. 2017. 〈halshs-01529643〉



Consultations de la notice


Téléchargements de fichiers